[xmonad] xmonad Digest, Vol 96, Issue 3

[Alexander Genaud]

Or, if x.x.B already has meaning (bugfix release), then rc (release
candidate) notation would serve a similar purpose:

0.12.5-rc1 ==> 0.12.5 (bugfix release)
0.13-rc1 ==> 0.13 (major/minor release)

I think the difference is EVERY Java release must be a supported standard
target. Xmonad has local, but no global, critical child dependencies. One
would never recommend that a general user compiles bleeding edge Javac for
any real work -- yet that's what some Xmonad-ers have recommended for two
years.

If 0.12.3 exists, but is not considered stable, then 0.12-rc3 or 0.12b3
would seem more appropriate.

> Oh, yes.. i didn't check the page. I've been too much in the java
> world using the snapshot descriptor, it would be cool if we had such a
> thing in xmonad in where 0.12 would be release notation for example
> and 0.12.5 would be upstream notation, and a preparation for 0.13.
> 0.12.5 is released as 0.13 and the darcs version is updated to 0.13.5
> and so forth.. I attach the patches in case this resonates with you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20150302/c3d348a8/attachment.html>