[xmonad] Dynamic xmobar spawning

Brandon Allbery allbery.b at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 09:28:33 CET 2011


On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 22:25, Ben Boeckel <mathstuf at gmail.com> wrote:

> beyond what is already done in xmobar itself. There's also the question
> of whether an X11-Xrandr package makes more sense (Xinerama is already
> there, but xft isn't). I imagine xmobar would also pick up the code that
> gets put into X11 or X11-Xrandr for its Xrandr needs instead of its own
> bindings if/when that happens.
>

There's already an X11-xft package (which includes Render (not RandR)
support; I'm not sure if that belongs there).  As to RandR, my inclination
is that it should be part of X11, not a separate package — as long as the
package continues to work in the absence of RandR.

-- 
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b at gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20111214/db035bde/attachment.htm>


More information about the xmonad mailing list