[xmonad] Re: Re: xmonad-0.9.1 leaves zombie processes around

[Matthias Kilian]

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:05:30PM +0200, Tomá? Janou?ek wrote:
> > Better wait. Somehting else must be wrong then, and it may as well
> > be in GHCs libraries. I'll try to setup some test cases for this.
> 
> No. Nobody said that OpenBSD conforms to that POSIX-something. Just apply the
> patch I just posted to the list and be happy :-).

Yes, thanks for the patch.

(There are still some strange things wrong with OpenBSD; at least
sigaction(2) should be POSIX compliant; on the other hand, the
implementation of signal(3) seems to differ from what the manpage says)

Ciao,
	Kili