[xmonad] Segfault on startup
Rafael Almeida
almeidaraf at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 22:06:04 EST 2008
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 06:52:00 -0500, "Brent Yorgey" <byorgey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Don Stewart <dons at galois.com> wrote:
> roma:
> > * Rafael Almeida <almeidaraf at gmail.com> [2008-03-06 02:57:16-0300]
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Don Stewart <dons at galois.com>
> wrote:
> > > > almeidaraf:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've been using xmonad from darcs. Today I pulled the latest
> version
> > > > > and, after compiling xmonad, I found it segfaults during the
> startup.
> > > > > I'm running a debian 4.0 (etch) and I've installed X11 1.4.1
> on my
> > > > > local user.
> > > >
> > > > Almost certainly this is because you have a partially
> recompiled xmonad.
> > > > Please do a full make clean, then try again.
> > > >
> > > > runhaskell Setup.lhs clean
> > > >
> > > > then rebuild.
> > > >
> > > > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Xmonad/
> Frequently_asked_questions#Help.21_xmonad_just_segfaulted
> > > >
> > > > Same for any config repo you use.
> > > >
> > >
> > > That doesn't seem the issue because I would always delete xmonad-
> new
> > > directory and recreate it using
> > >
> > > $ darcs get xmonad --to-patch=patchname xmonad-new
> > >
> > > in order to find out which patch broke it. Just in case I just
> did:
> > >
> > > $ darcs get http://code.haskell.org/xmonad --to-patch="Core.hs:
> add an
> > > Applicative" xmonad-new
> > >
> > > and compiled it. Sure enough, xmonad segfaulted on startup.
> >
> > As far as I see from your config, you also use xmonad contrib
> library.
> > Have you recompiled it as well?
>
> Ah yes, that needs to be fully cleaned and recompiled.
>
> And then confirm that without any config file it either is ok, or
> crashes.
>
> Just to make sure everything is completely clear: every time you rebuild
> xmonad, you must do a full clean and rebuild of xmonad-contrib. Otherwise it
> doesn't realize that a library it depends on has changed, and continues
> referencing the old library, which may or may not cause a crash. =(
>
> I'm pretty sure there's no way that simply adding an instance could cause a
> crash, except for the recompilation problem explained above, or a bug in ghc.
>
> -Brent
>
Oh yes. That was indeed the problem here. My bad :(. I was kinda thrown
away because I thought you'd never get a Segmentation Fault from a code
written in Haskell. But I supose that the error came from the C code on
X11, right? Shouldn't it return a nicer error instead of segfaulting? Or
is this behaviour expectable?
More information about the xmonad
mailing list