[xmonad] New keybinding parser
Spencer Janssen
sjanssen at cse.unl.edu
Tue Feb 26 21:31:55 EST 2008
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:05:00PM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:39:23PM -0500, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just pushed (what I hope is) an exciting patch to XMonad.Util.EZConfig.
> > It now exports a bunch of functions for parsing keybindings, emacs-style.
> > That's right, instead of typing
> >
> > ((modMask x .|. shiftMask .|. controlMask, xK_F12), action)
> >
> > or other such boilerplate drudgery, you can now just say
> >
> > ("M-S-C-<F12>", action).
> >
> > Submaps are also supported -- just do something like
> >
> > ("M-x p", action1)
> > ("M-x q", action2)
> >
> > and it does the right thing. Detailed documentation is included, so look
> > there for a more thorough explanation and examples. As always, comments,
> > bug reports, and patches welcome.
>
> This sounds nice, but I can't help but wonder if we can't do one up, and
> provide our users with a handy interface that doesn't allow them to run
> into run-time parse errors. Something like
>
> (m 'q', action0)
> (m $ s $ c f12, action1)
> (m $ s $ c 'x', action2)
>
> should be trivial to implement (albeit eating up the namespace rather
> ferociously), and would give a bit more safety with only a
> slightly-less-pretty syntax. Submaps would require a bit more syntax, but
> something like
>
> (m x &&& 'q')
>
> should be implementable. I'm not sure if this would be deemed worthwhile,
> but it seems to me a bit more elegant than parsing strings into key
> bindings.
>
> David
Of course the character literals can still cause parse failure at runtime.
More information about the xmonad
mailing list