[xmonad] change Layout to `l' in XConfig?
David Roundy
droundy at darcs.net
Wed Nov 14 10:16:54 EST 2007
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Valery V. Vorotyntsev wrote:
> On 11/13/07, David Roundy <droundy at darcs.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Valery V. Vorotyntsev wrote:
> > > Can we use more general type in XConfig definition?
> >
> > I didn't think we could. Does it actually work? I'd think that'd break
>
> And it did. :) See http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=89#c2
>
> > things. i.e. there's no way I can see to change a function (XConfig l ->
> > a) to a function (XConfig Layout -> a), which we'd need to do.
> >
> > Is there any reason other than elegance that you'd like to do this?
>
> No reason, just my stupidity. Sorry.
No problem! It's always worth asking, if it seems like there's a better way
to do something. :)
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
More information about the xmonad
mailing list