[Xmonad] statically checked non-empty layout lists
David Roundy
droundy at darcs.net
Fri May 4 10:05:15 EDT 2007
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:16:35PM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> dons:
> > The new layout code introduces more chances for runtime errors than I'd
> > like. In particular, the Dynamic type, and the possibility of users
> > defining empty layout lists.
>
> And a patch, just so its archived somewhere.
I'd vote yes on this. Only I'd prefer an infix constructor for Cons, such
as :.: or something, so pattern matching will be prettier.
--
David Roundy
http://www.darcs.net
More information about the Xmonad
mailing list