[Xmonad] xmobar-0.4 - the xmonad status bar - released!
Andrea Rossato
mailing_list at istitutocolli.org
Thu Jul 5 12:11:05 EDT 2007
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 05:10:10PM +0200, Robert Manea wrote:
> * Andrea Rossato (mailing_list at istitutocolli.org) wrote:
> > XMobar is a minimalistic text only status bar.
> >
> > What's new:
> > - many performance improvements on the monitors side;
> [...]
> > Any suggestion, comments, critics are welcome.
>
> I would suggest to consider improving overall memory usage:
>
> PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command
> 12955 robert 15 0 37932 2512 1508 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.03 ./dist/build/xmobar/xmobar
> 12956 robert 15 0 37932 2512 1508 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.01 ./dist/build/xmobar/xmobar
> 12958 robert 18 0 37932 2512 1508 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.02 ./dist/build/xmobar/xmobar
> 12961 robert 15 0 37932 2512 1508 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.00 ./dist/build/xmobar/xmobar
> 12954 robert 15 0 37932 2512 1508 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.09 ./dist/build/xmobar/xmobar
well, this does not tell me much, actually... xmobar is linked to
everything needed to run a haskell binary in your system, and all this
stuff must be loaded.
have a look here:
http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html
> Just for comparision purposes:
>
> 2982 robert 15 0 5640 2436 1528 S 0.0 0.7 0:01.95 /home/robert/bin/xmonad
> 2981 robert 15 0 4044 984 796 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.14 dzen2
This is just a misleading statement: dzen is using a lot of library
that are already loaded into memory. This is not a useful comparison.
You should know that.
But if I'm getting something wrong please let me know.
Anyway thanks for your kind attention.
Ciao
Andrea
More information about the Xmonad
mailing list