michael at snoyman.com
Tue Dec 13 15:14:13 CET 2011
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu at iij.ad.jp> wrote:
>> writev might make the different here, I'm not sure. I haven't done any
>> performance testing on the difference between writev with a number of
>> smaller ByteStrings versus a single larger ByteString. That would be
>> an interesting distinction.
>> But I suppose there's also a A1b answer. The only downside it seems of
>> using Builder versus ByteString is the extra typing a user needs in
>> order to convert to Builders. If we switch to ByteString, it may be
>> true that we can achieve the same performance of Builders (based on
>> the question of writev performance above), but it would require extra
>> thought from a user to ensure that they properly concatenate their
>> Builders. In this case, I would not expect writev to have the same
>> performance, as the ByteStrings are likely coming through in different
> OK. Let's add these to doc.
> Thank you for your time.
Added on Git, thanks for the input.
More information about the web-devel