[web-devel] Fwd: Yesod. Routes. Resources. Authorization. ACL

[Anakreon Mentis]

I understand that it is provided for convenience. In case the authors
of yesod are considering changes in the function's interface, it would
be more convenient to write
isAuthorized HomeR POST = Unauthorized

Admitably is just a little more convenient and perhaps is not worth
the hassle to check if anyone is using the Bool parameter of
isAuthorized and possibly make a non backward compatible change.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Max Cantor <mxcantor at gmail.com> wrote:
> forgot to reply to all
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Max Cantor <mxcantor at gmail.com>
>> Date: July 19, 2011 10:45:54 AM GMT+08:00
>> To: Anakreon Mentis <anakreonmejdi at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [web-devel] Yesod. Routes. Resources. Authorization. ACL
>>
>> Since isAuthorized runs in the Handler monad you can pull out the request method from the request.  I think the second parameter is just intended as a bit of a timesaver.
>>
>> max
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Anakreon Mentis wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the isAuthorized function discussed at
>>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/web-devel/2011/000855.html, I believe
>>> it would be better if the second parameter was the method (GET, POST,
>>> ..) instead of a boolean indicating if it is POST or DELETE.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> web-devel mailing list
>>> web-devel at haskell.org
>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> web-devel mailing list
> web-devel at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel
>