[web-devel] ALPHA: http-types 0.1

[Michael Snoyman]

I have no idea how comprehensive. My best advice would be to add the
first ones that come to mind and let users tell you what's missing.

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Aristid Breitkreuz
<aristidb at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Sure, will do both.
>
> How comprehensive should the header list be?
>
> Am 04.02.2011 11:05 schrieb "Michael Snoyman" <michael at snoyman.com>:
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Aristid Breitkreuz
> <aristidb at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Writing this ...
>
> Yes, for functions I don't care what you name things. It's
> specifically data constructors that breaks backwards compatibility.
>
>> Headers are already there, no? You're confusing me.
>
> I was talking about the semi-exhaustive list of headers that people
> often request, eg hdrAccept = "Accept", hdrContentType =
> "Content-Type", etc. It was brought up in the original thread.
>
>> Thanks for the nice feedback!
>>
>> Aristid
>> "sent from my Android"
>>
>> Am 04.02.2011 07:09 schrie...