[web-devel] web-routes-quasi

[Peter Robinson]

Again, nice work! :) The web-routes-quasi package makes writing routes quite
enjoyable. One thing that I was wondering about is, is it possible to
get the list of supported methods (as [String]) for a given url?

  Peter


On 4 April 2010 20:34, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
> ... and now that's done :-). You can use whatever methods you want now, and
> it also solves the annoying issue when importing both Web.Routes.Quasi and
> Network.Wai.
> Michael
>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Because I want to eventually get rid of the Method datatype entirely and
>> allow arbitrary methods ;).
>> Michael
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Peter Robinson <thaldyron at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice work!
>>>
>>> Is there a specific reason for excluding HEAD and OPTIONS?
>>>
>>>  Peter
>>>
>>> On 3 April 2010 00:51, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
>>> > web-routes-quasi is now at the point where it can be used for sites,
>>> > and I'd
>>> > love to hear some feedback. I've put together a little sample that
>>> > demonstrates how you can use quasi-quoting and define your routes,
>>> > embed
>>> > subsites and serve the resulting application via WAI. (My example uses
>>> > WAI,
>>> > but the package itself is not tied to WAI.)
>>> > The code is on github[1]; the main function for the blog is in blog.hs
>>> > (with
>>> > the lowercase b). I believe this just depends on Jeremy's web-routes
>>> > package, wai and wai-extra.
>>> > Note that I did not use web-routes-wai; I think there are some problems
>>> > in
>>> > there for breaking up the pathinfo, and I didn't have time to dig
>>> > through
>>> > it. Also, this package currently ignores entirely the defaultPage
>>> > component
>>> > of Site, though if there is desire support can be added for it.
>>> > One minor bug is that you can't have an alternate GET, POST, PUT or
>>> > DELETE
>>> > constructor imported; hopefully that will get cleaned up.
>>> > Any comments and suggestions are welcome! My goal is to port Yesod over
>>> > to
>>> > this as soon as the web-routes set of packages are released, so if
>>> > you're
>>> > interested in Yesod, you should be interested in this too ;).
>>> > Michael
>>> > [1] http://github.com/snoyberg/web-routes-quasi
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > web-devel mailing list
>>> > web-devel at haskell.org
>>> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>
>