[web-devel] On the state of Haskell web frameworks
cjs at starling-software.com
Tue Mar 16 03:48:13 EDT 2010
On 2010-03-16 02:59 -0400 (Tue), Gregory Collins wrote:
> Curt Sampson <cjs at starling-software.com> writes:
> I think you're confusing content-encoding and transfer-encoding here.
Yup. Oops, sorry.
> > Another approach would be to have interface library buffer the response
> > as it's being generated and, when it's complete, calculate the content
> > length and pass it on to the web server.
> This breaks "being able to stream in O(1) space", so it's out. Concrete
> examples: comet, internet radio, etc.
Having *the option* to do this for efficiency does not break streaming.
Only forcing everyone to use this would do that.
My point is, if you provide only one way of doing things, you can end
up in a situation where some applications will still work, but be a lot
more inefficient than they would be otherwise.
> By "interface layer" for the purposes of this conversation I mean
> roughly the level of abstraction that Hack/WAI/WSGI/Rack/Java Servlets
> are inhabiting.
Ah, well this is what I'm saying: that should ideally be part of a
standalone library that translates between the web applicaton and the
protocol you use to talk to the server.
Curt Sampson <cjs at cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
by those who have not got it. --George Bernard Shaw
More information about the web-devel