[nhc-users] Doubts in bytecode
Arunkumar S Jadhav
arunk at it.iitb.ac.in
Tue Mar 15 01:28:10 EST 2005
Hello,
I've two questions which are unrelated. I'll ask them one by one.
Q1)
I've this function:
myFoo :: (Int -> Int -> Int) -> Int -> Int -> Int
myFoo f x y = f (x+y) (x-y)
And it compiles to the following bytecode (I've pasted just the
byte code part, just ignore other details).
bytes2word(NEEDHEAP_I32,PUSH_HEAP,HEAP_CVAL_I3,HEAP_ARG_ARG)
, bytes2word(2,3,PUSH_HEAP,HEAP_CVAL_I4)
, bytes2word(HEAP_ARG_ARG,2,3,PUSH_P1)
, bytes2word(0,PUSH_P1,2,PUSH_ZAP_ARG_I1)
, bytes2word(ZAP_ARG_I2,ZAP_ARG_I3,ZAP_STACK_P1,4)
, bytes2word(ZAP_STACK_P1,3,EVAL,NEEDHEAP_I32)
, bytes2word(APPLY,2,RETURN_EVAL,ENDCODE)
Okay, as I've come to understand, this is how things work out.
1. Construct the graph for (x + y) and push its root onto stack.
PUSH_HEAP, HEAP_CVAL_I3, HEAP_ARG_ARG, 2, 3
2. Construct the graph for (x - y) and push its root onto stack.
PUSH_HEAP,HEAP_CVAL_I4, HEAP_ARG_ARG, 2, 3
3. Now push the first argument onto heap, make top of stack point to
it and evaluate it then apply its result to top two elements on stack.
(I understand that arguments have to be ZAPped before we start
evaluating them, so I know what ZAP is doing here)
PUSH_ZAP_ARG_I1, ZAP_ARG_I2,ZAP_ARG_I3,ZAP_STACK_P1,4
ZAP_STACK_P1,3,EVAL,NEEDHEAP_I32, APPLY,2
Now in between all these contents of stack that were pointing
to two graphs (i.e x+y and x-y) are being replicated on the stack and then
one of the copies (of both the graphs) is being zapped as can be seen
from the code snippet below.
PUSH_P1, 0, PUSH_P1,2, ,ZAP_STACK_P1,4, ZAP_STACK_P1,3
This has caught me off guard. I just couldn't figure out why is this being
done ? i.e Why copy the contents of stack and then zap one of them.
Also what all are the uses of ZAP nodes apart from black hole detection.
Do ZAP nodes help in garbage collection too ?
Now second doubt.
Q2) As Malcolm explained in detail this is the purpose of CONSTR macro
CONSTR(c,s,ws)
Construct a tag (i.e. a header for a data node) where there is
a mixture of pointers and basic values amongst the data items
I compiled various examples but till now I haven't seen a single example
where CONSTR is used for a mixture of pointers and basic values. It has
always been for basic values. I'll illustrate with an example.
data MyData a = One | Two a | Three a (MyData a) (MyData a) | Four a a a a a
intToData :: Int -> MyData Int
intToData n = Three 12 (Two 13) One
Now the constant table for function "intToData" contains these entries.
, CONSTR(2,3,0)
, CONSTR(0,0,0)
, CONSTR(1,1,0)
Clearly, they correspond to the constructors "Three", "One" and "Two"
respectively. I expected to see something like CONSTR(2,3, 2) for
"Three" constructor because it's second and third field are supposed to
be pointers. But this is not the case. Can you please give an example
where CONSTR is actually used to construct a mixture of pointer and
basic data nodes.
Thanks for your patience in going through this. Any help regarding this
will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
------------------------------------
Arunkumar S Jadhav, Masters Student,
KReSIT, IIT-Bombay, India
Ph: +91-22-25764967
http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~arunk
------------------------------------
I exist because I work.
More information about the Nhc-users
mailing list