[nhc-bugs] confhc does not recognize ghc 5.*
Malcolm Wallace
Malcolm.Wallace@cs.york.ac.uk
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:53:29 +0100
Mieszko Lis <elf@sandburst.com> writes:
> i ran into a compiler-detection bug in building nhc98 (the 1.10 tarball,
> but the same bug seems to be in cvs and earlier versions): the build
> process fails to detect the default ghc 5.02 installation on my debian
> linux machine as well as the ghc 5.00.2 installation on a redhat 7.1 box
> nearby.
>
> the problem turns out to be that script/confhc looks through the ghc
> executable for the wrong stuff (at least in the installations i
> mentioned above). i attached a patch (against the cvs tree) to fix
> this at least on these debian and redhat installations.
Here is the essential part of the patch:
- GHCDIR=`grep '^libdir' ${whichGHC} | head -1 | sed 's/^libdir=.\(.*\)./\1/'`
+ GHCDIR=`grep '^TOPDIROPT' ${whichGHC} | head -1 | sed 's/^TOPDIROPT="*-B\([^";]*\).*/\1/'`
However, this does not work on my (Slackware Linux) machine. In the
driver script for ghc-5.02, I see the following two lines:
libdir='/usr/malcolm/local/lib/ghc-5.02'
TOPDIROPT="-B$libdir";
which means that the original confhc gives the correct path
(/usr/malcolm/local/lib/ghc-5.02), but the patched confhc gives an
incorrect path symbol ($libdir).
Can someone at ghc central confirm whether this part of the ghc-5.02
driver script differs, depending on package and platform? And if so,
what is the best way to detect which variation applies?
Regards,
Malcolm