Proposal: export more Data.Sequence internals
Simon Jakobi
simon.jakobi at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 16 23:13:43 UTC 2021
Hi David, and apologies for the late response!
I don't have much to add to this discussion since I'm rather
unfamiliar with the Data.Sequence internals and fingertrees in
general. Since this code is pretty stable AFAIK, I don't see a problem
with exposing it under the PVP.
My only suggestion would be to find a slightly better name than
Data.Sequence.StableInternal. Something like Data.Sequence.Core
perhaps?!
Cheers!
Simon
Am Fr., 5. Feb. 2021 um 22:22 Uhr schrieb David Feuer <david.feuer at gmail.com>:
>
> I'd like containers to export more Data.Sequence internals, and to do
> so in a way that allows external users to rely on them. I propose the
> following:
>
> 1. Add a module, Data.FingerTree.IntPlus, abstractly exporting the
> finger trees used to represent sequences. These can also be used for
> other finger trees with measurements in the (Int, +) monoid. This
> would include various basic operations for cons, snoc, and splitting,
> with most names the same as for sequences.
> 2. Add a module, Data.FingerTree.IntPlus.Unsafe, exporting efficient
> mapping/traversing functions that rely on specific preconditions to
> maintain the internal fingertree annotation invariant.
> 3. Add a module, Data.Sequence.StableInternal, exporting the internal
> structure of sequences and also some internal functions that may be
> useful elsewhere (I'm particularly interested in the `splitMap`
> function and future variants thereof). Unlike the `.Internal` module,
> this module would be subject to the package version policy, and would
> therefore be more suitable for use by other packages.
>
> I am very open to suggestions for modifications to the module names.
> One option might be to put all the FingerTree.IntPlus stuff in the
> Data.Sequence.StableInternal hierarchy, if folks think it should be
> buried a bit.
>
> David
More information about the Libraries
mailing list