Give alternate default definition for (<=)

Dannyu NDos ndospark320 at gmail.com
Wed May 27 05:37:34 UTC 2020


Sorry for the mix-up. It really turns out that I can't really define (==)
with only min and max. However, it turns out that the suggested default
definition is effective when (==) is properly given. I've come up with
another type where it is effective, so stay tuned.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20200527/d648bebc/attachment.html>


More information about the Libraries mailing list