Break `abs` into two aspects
Andrew Lelechenko
andrew.lelechenko at gmail.com
Fri Jan 31 20:38:31 UTC 2020
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Dannyu NDos wrote:
> Second, I suggest to move `abs` and `signum` from `Num` to `Floating`
I can fully relate your frustration with `abs` and `signum` (and numeric type classes in Haskell altogether). But IMO breaking both in `Num` and in `Floating` at once is not a promising way to make things proper.
I would rather follow the beaten track of Applicative Monad and Semigroup Monoid proposals and - as a first step - introduce a superclass (probably, borrowing the design from `semirings` package):
class Semiring a where
zero :: a
plus :: a -> a -> a
one :: a
times :: a -> a -> a
fromNatural :: Natural -> a
class Semiring a => Num a where ...
Tangible benefits in `base` include:
a) instance Semiring Bool,
b) a total instance Semiring Natural (in contrast to a partial instance Num Natural),
c) instance Num a => Semiring (Complex a) (in contrast to instance RealFloat a => Num (Complex a)),
d) newtypes Sum and Product would require only Semiring constraint instead of Num.
Best regards,
Andrew
More information about the Libraries
mailing list