Proposal for containers: Add 'pop' function to Data.Map
Oleg Grenrus
oleg.grenrus at iki.fi
Sun Dec 6 18:04:58 UTC 2020
NonEmptySeq could be. NonEmptySet almost (it could have extract).
- Oleg
On 6.12.2020 20.02, David Feuer wrote:
> None of these types are comonads, so it doesn't seem *that* confusing.
>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2020, 12:59 PM Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com
> <mailto:bob at redivi.com>> wrote:
>
> `extract` overlaps with the Comonad typeclass (extract, duplicate,
> extend)
>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 9:34 AM Tom Ellis
> <tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2017 at jaguarpaw.co.uk
> <mailto:tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2017 at jaguarpaw.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> I really like `extract`!
>
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:29:40PM +0000, Alexey Kuleshevich
> wrote:
> > `extract` is the name that I would suggest. I also agree
> with David
> > that `pop` is a bit too confusing in a non-stack/queue data
> > structure. If all languages named it pop, then it would be good
> > argument for the name, but we don't need to copy python. The
> only
> > thing that pyhon has that I wish we had in Haskell is the
> popularity
> > ;)
> >
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Sunday, December 6, 2020 8:16 PM, Carter Schonwald
> <carter.schonwald at gmail.com
> <mailto:carter.schonwald at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > LookupThenRemove seems like a more descriptive name.
> Though I guess I can see why pop has appeal.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:44 AM David Feuer
> <david.feuer at gmail.com <mailto:david.feuer at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I suggest you add a version for Data.Sequence combining
> lookup with deleteAt. I wanted that for something fairly recently.
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2020, 11:41 AM Martijn Bastiaan via
> Libraries <libraries at haskell.org
> <mailto:libraries at haskell.org>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Yeah, Python's `pop` made me call it `pop`. I had hoped
> to find other
> > >>> examples, but Java, Rust, and Ruby don't seem to offer
> `pop`-like
> > >>> functions for their (hash)maps.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 12/6/20 5:29 PM, Tom Ellis wrote:
> > >>>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 11:25:33AM -0500, David Feuer
> wrote:
> > >>>>> The name pop makes me think of a stack. Is this use of
> the word common?
> > >>>> Python uses that name, which is why I'm familiar with it:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>> d = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
> > >>>>>>> d.pop('b')
> > >>>> 2
> > >>>>>>> d
> > >>>> {'a': 1}
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Libraries mailing list
> > >>>> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > >>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Libraries mailing list
> > >>> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > >>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Libraries mailing list
> > >> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libraries mailing list
> > Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20201206/2cda45a7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list