containers: symmetricDifference for Set and HashSet
Andreas Abel
andreas.abel at ifi.lmu.de
Tue Dec 1 18:35:14 UTC 2020
> symmetricDifference :: Set a -> Set a -> (Set a, Set a, Set a)
Since projections from a 3-tuples are not in base (why?, one could
wonder), I plea for a telling result name that helps confusing these
three outputs. Something like
data SymmetricDifference = SymmetricDifference
{ symDiffLeft :: Set a
, symDiffCommon :: Set a
, symDiffRight :: Set a
}
(Also fixing the problem of absent projections.)
On 2020-12-01 10:16, Ben Franksen wrote:
> Would it make sense to add a function like the following to containers:
>
> symmetricDifference :: Set a -> Set a -> (Set a, Set a, Set a)
> symmetricDifference a b = (a \\ b, a `intersection` b, b \\ a)
>
> with the idea that this can be implemented more efficiently as a
> primitive than the above specification? (And similarly for HashSet.)
>
> If this is the case, then perhaps difference and intersection could be
> defined in terms of this new primitive:
>
> difference a b = let (r, _, _) = symmetricDifference in r
> intersection a b = let (_, r, _) = symmetricDifference in r
>
> *if* it turns out that this does not degrade performance.
>
> Cheers
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list