Applicative ((->) c) methods

[David Feuer]

They're not the same in general, no, but they're the same for the ((->) c)
Applicative, which is the topic of this discussion.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 1:04 AM Tony Morris <tonymorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> No, they are not the same function.
>
> λ> let (*>) = flip const in putStrLn "hi" *> putStrLn "bye"
> bye
> λ> let (*>) = liftA2 (flip const) in putStrLn "hi" *> putStrLn "bye"
> hi
> bye
>
> On 20/11/19 3:41 pm, David Feuer wrote:
>
> Both are correct.
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 12:15 AM Tony Morris <tonymorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is incorrect.
>>
>> (<*) = liftA2 const
>> (*>) = liftA2 (flip const)
>>
>> On 19/11/19 6:40 am, Keith wrote:
>> > Just thinking for Applicative ((->) c)
>> > (<*) = const
>> > (*>) = flip const -- or \ _ x -> x
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20191120/be3065de/attachment.html>