Proposal: give a field name to Data.Ord.Down

chessai . chessai1996 at gmail.com
Sat May 4 20:20:30 UTC 2019


+1

On Thu, May 2, 2019, 10:56 PM Fumiaki Kinoshita <fumiexcel at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's awkward to write a lambda to unwrap this kind of wrappers. I propose
>
> newtype Down a = Down { getDown :: a }
>
> with the Show/Read instances as if they didn't have named fields.
>
> The same goes for Control.Arrow.ArrowMonad, although I'm not sure about
> its usefulness...
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20190504/38593d02/attachment.html>


More information about the Libraries mailing list