Is there a function \x -> (x, x) in standard libraries?
Andreas Abel
andreas.abel at ifi.lmu.de
Wed Jul 17 11:26:30 UTC 2019
On 2019-07-16 23:21, Dan Burton wrote:
> +1 for "dup", if it is to be included at all.
Same here. --Andreas
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:56 PM Vladislav Zavialov
> <vladislav at serokell.io <mailto:vladislav at serokell.io>> wrote:
>
> It is reasonably common. I have grepped Hackage using
> https://codesearch.aelve.com/haskell/ and
>
> * \x->(x,x) occurs 203 times
> * join (,) occurs 53 times
> * id &&& id occurs 22 times
>
> It also pops up in discussions as a counter-example of a linear
> function:
>
> dup :: a ->. (a,a)
> dup x = (x,x) -- does not typecheck with -XLinearTypes!
>
> I think it should be added under the name "dup" (short for “duplicate”).
>
> - Vlad
>
> > On 16 Jul 2019, at 22:29, Lennart Augustsson
> <lennart at augustsson.net <mailto:lennart at augustsson.net>> wrote:
> >
> > It's not harmful, but is it common enough to have a name?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 12:28 Ignat Insarov <kindaro at gmail.com
> <mailto:kindaro at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > So, it is not considered harmful. Then I propose we add it to
> > Data.Tuple under a humane name.
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 19:41, Lennart Augustsson
> <lennart at augustsson.net <mailto:lennart at augustsson.net>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Or 'join (,)'
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 09:26 Zemyla <zemyla at gmail.com
> <mailto:zemyla at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> id &&& id
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 10:58 Ignat Insarov <kindaro at gmail.com
> <mailto:kindaro at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello.
> > >>>
> > >>> I wonder if there is a function like \x -> (x, x) in the
> standard libraries.
> > >>>
> > >>> I looked up in Hoogle. It gave me links:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1.
> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/utility-ht/docs/Data-Tuple-HT.html#v:double
> > >>> 2.
> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/extra/docs/Data-Tuple-Extra.html#v:dupe
> > >>> 3.
> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/relude/docs/Relude-Extra-Tuple.html#v:dupe
> > >>>
> > >>> None of these is to the standard library. I wonder if there is an
> > >>> intentional omission for some important reason? If not, I
> think this
> > >>> function should be added to Data.Tuple.
> > >>>
> > >>> I know some of the persons that make decisions here like Category
> > >>> theory, so I point out this function is mentioned in
> Categories for
> > >>> the Working Mathematician, as δ, the diagonal function, on page 3
> > >>> (second edition), although set with angular brackets.
> > >>>
> > >>> Have a great day.
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Libraries mailing list
> > >>> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > >>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Libraries mailing list
> > >> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libraries mailing list
> > Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list