Request for comment on new package

[Mario Blažević]

On 2019-08-06 3:29 a.m., David Feuer wrote:
> Of course, I forgot to actually link to the package candidate. Whoops!
> Here it is:
> 
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/lazify-0.1.0.0/candidate

I think lazy would be a better function name than lazify. Generally 
speaking, verbs (i.e., actions) should bind to monadic functions.

You put a lot of faith in GHC optimizations. I wouldn't rely on the 
default lazify = glazify implementation so much.

Finally, some missing instances from base:

- a -> b
- NonEmpty
- Complex
- Alt
- Par1
- Rec1