Proposal: Lifting to TExpQ
Emil Axelsson
78emil at gmail.com
Sat Jan 13 22:42:04 UTC 2018
Ah, yes. That's more than I could take on now, but sounds like the right
way to do lifting.
/ Emil
Den 2018-01-12 kl. 13:17, skrev Simon Peyton Jones:
> Indeed. Moreover there is nothing unsafe about this, so I'd like to see this done without using unsafe-anything.
>
> To do this, the Lift class would need to change, from
>
> class Lift t where
> lift :: t -> Q Exp
>
> to
>
> class Lift t where
> lift :: t -> Q (TExp t)
>
> This would take a bit of work, but it looks to me as if it would be a Good Thing.
> Maybe someone could write up a design?
>
> Simon
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Libraries [mailto:libraries-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of
> | Emil Axelsson
> | Sent: 12 January 2018 10:48
> | To: Haskell Libraries <libraries at haskell.org>
> | Subject: Proposal: Lifting to TExpQ
> |
> | Hi!
> |
> | I wasn't able to find a function like this anywhere:
> |
> | liftT :: Lift a => a -> TExpQ a
> | liftT = unsafeTExpCoerce . lift
> |
> | It seems like a nice addition that would reduce the need for
> | `unsafeTExpCoerce` in user code.
> |
> | Should it be added?
> |
> | / Emil
> | _______________________________________________
> | Libraries mailing list
> | Libraries at haskell.org
> | https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.h
> | askell.org%2Fcgi-
> | bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flibraries&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsof
> | t.com%7C3f68f4551f724d2d8cfa08d559a9f13b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd01
> | 1db47%7C1%7C0%7C636513508787847030&sdata=FUvPD77GrLn%2Bkc3ZUwfinQacU8p
> | s00oXFvfI6VhoD1Q%3D&reserved=0
>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list