Name for unary unboxed one-tuple

[Andrew Martin]

My vote is for Single/Single#.

Also, in case there is any confusion around this, I was not a member of the
CLC when this issue was originally raised, but the committee has accepted
me since then.



On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Simon Peyton Jones via Libraries <
libraries at haskell.org> wrote:

> Dear Libraries Committee
>
> Some time ago Andrew Martin asked you
> <https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2018-January/028419.html>
> what the name of the unary unboxed one-tuple type and data constructor
> should be.  The thread ran for a while, but you never came to a conclusion.
>
> Can we nail this one?   You’ll see on Trac #14673
> <https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14673#comment:19> that chessai
> wants me to decide 😊.  But it should really be you.
>
> To me, there seems to be something of a consensus around Solo#.
>
> Simon
>
> PS: actually I think Andrew may have addressed libraries@ rather than
> core-libraries-committee@ by mistake.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>


-- 
-Andrew Thaddeus Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20180425/c22e0aad/attachment.html>