Map with a different Monoid instance

Mario Blažević mblazevic at stilo.com
Thu May 25 22:10:52 UTC 2017


On 2017-05-25 04:08 PM, David Feuer wrote:
> Unbiased sounds nice, but I'm a bit concerned that it might suggest
> bigger differences than just the Monoid instance. I assume people
> still want the same left-biased union function.

	I agree. Quite apart from the compatibility issues, I'd rather use 
mappend or (<>) once the instances are fixed than any union function, 
biased or not.


> 
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Mario Blažević <mblazevic at stilo.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2017-05-25 12:55 PM, David Feuer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A lot of people have wrappers around Data.Map and Data.IntMap to give
>>>> them more useful (Semigroup and) Monoid instances. I'd like to add such
>>>> wrappers to containers. What we need to be able to do that are *names* for
>>>> the new modules. I can't think of any, so I'm reaching out to the list.
>>>> Please suggest names!
>>>
>>>
>>> Data.Map.Monoidal is not strictly correct but would give a pretty good
>>> idea at first glance.
>>>
>>> Data.Map.Symmetric would be more correct, since its Semigroup and Monoid
>>> instances would be symmetric, with no preference for the left argument as
>>> currently.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Just to throw out an option here: Unbiased. I don't feel strongly about it,
>> but thought throwing it out may be helpful.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Another question is whether we should take the opportunity of new modules
>>>> to modernize and streamline the API a bit. I'd like, at least, to separate
>>>> "safe" from "unsafe" functions, putting the unsafe ones in .Unsafe modules.
>>>
>>>
>>>          I think it would be better to keep the API exactly the same, much
>>> like Data.Map.Strict does. I don't want to think about the incidental API
>>> differences when I switch from one module to another. If you're going to
>>> modernize, modernize all the modules at once. That's what version numbers
>>> are for.
>>
>>
>> +1. I'd also argue against changing the API right now.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>


-- 
Mario Blazevic
mblazevic at stilo.com
Stilo International

This message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, or
distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient(s) please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message and any attachments.


More information about the Libraries mailing list