Proposal: Add conspicuously missing Functor instances for tuples

[David Feuer]

I'd be strongly +1 on that too! Traversable is strong magic.

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott at gmail.com> wrote:
> Strong +1 from me. We derive Eq/Ord/Read/Show/etc. for all tuple types
> of size up to 15 as it is, we might as well do the same for Functor.
>
> (Personally, I'd even argue for adding Foldable and Traversable
> instances as well, but the Foldable instance for pairs has proven to
> be pretty controversial...)
>
> Ryan S.
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries