Haskell Foldable Wats
Kosyrev Serge
_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
Thu Feb 25 10:53:44 UTC 2016
Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr at gnu.org> writes:
> Maybe relevant to this discussion: the rejected paper "Controlling the
> scope of instances in Haskell" submitted for the 2011 Haskell Symposium
> together with the rejecting referee reports[2]
>
> [1]: https://www.haskell.org/definition/from12to13.html
>
> [2]: https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2014-October/006876.html
Interestingly, the Review 4 states:
,----
| At a higher level, the paper did not address what could be described as
| the "philosophy" behind type classes, which were built with the intent
| of being used when there was only a single interpretation of an operator
| on a type.
`----
While this sounds intuitive to me, I have never heard it stated explicitly,
and moreso, actually being specifically intended at design level.
Is it possible to know more about this?
It does seem relevant to this discussion..
--
с уважениeм / respectfully,
Косырев Сергей
More information about the Libraries
mailing list