Proposal: pare down traversable

[David Feuer]

The fact that Monad got the nice sequence name and Applicative got the
ugly stepduckling sequenceA name is an unfortunate accident of history
that I for one do not want to see in the next Haskell Report. Once the
decision is made that something should go away, it seems generally
best to get rid of it sooner rather than later.


On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:
> On 09/27/2015 12:32 AM, David Feuer wrote:
>> Argh. I'd love to be able to deprecate sequenceA sooner rather than
>> later.
>
> Why? What benefit does this change bring?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>