Proposal: Data.Functor.<.> for `fmap f2 . f1`
andreas.abel at ifi.lmu.de
Sun Sep 20 10:19:32 UTC 2015
I also defined this <.> for my own use, see
(<.>) relates to (.) as (<$>) relates to ($).
I find myself in quite often in the need of my own "Functor" <.>, and at
least 100 times more seldom I require the "filepath" <.>.
Do we juggle around filepathes all the time when we program Haskell!?
Don't we rather combine functions a lot?
So, a conflict with filepath is not the final word.
On 20.09.2015 12:03, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 19.09.2015, 21:30 -0400 schrieb Ömer Sinan Ağacan:
>> One problem with this is that the name is used by widely used
>> `filepath` library.
> I would say that this kills this proposal right away...
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden
andreas.abel at gu.se
More information about the Libraries