Haskell ecosystem improvements meta-propsal
Mark Lentczner
mark.lentczner at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 06:45:15 UTC 2015
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> wrote:
> I've dealt with the IETF RFC process and the Python PEP process, and both
> of them worked better than that.
While both those are good examples of mostly working organizations
shepherding foundational technical standard(s) along... there is one thing
more important than their processes: Their stance. Both organizations have
a very strong engineering discipline of keeping deployed things working
without change. I don't think it is enough to simply model their process.
Until about three years ago, the Haskell community also had such a
discipline. It has been steadily eroding over the last few years.
- Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20151006/92505822/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list