Proposal: Dot as Postfix Function Apply

[Jeremy]

Alexander Berntsen wrote
> First of all, I don't like magic built-in stuff. And this certainly is
> just that. It requires a higher precedence than you can possibly give
> in regular code, and it is an exception to how all other operators
> work with regards to requiring no spaces (note that this is different
> to "not requiring spaces") -- this is reserved for module namespaces
> per now.

Indeed, this is intended to be syntactically the same as
dot-for-module-namespaces rather than an operator.



--
View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Dot-as-Postfix-Function-Apply-tp5821620p5821623.html
Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.