Generalizing map?

[John Lato]

-1.

On 08:05, Sun, Mar 15, 2015 Jeremy <voldermort at hotmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for generalising map.
>
> People who think that it will break lots of code should compile some
> popular
> packages and see for themselves. As for a better/no prelude, this has been
> talked about for years, but a wholesale replacement of the prelude hasn't
> happened yet and probably won't. Waiting for something that won't happen is
> no reason to block gradual improvement.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.
> nabble.com/Generalizing-map-tp5766936p5767023.html
> Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20150315/ec0ece30/attachment.html>