Generalizing replicateM?

M Farkas-Dyck strake888 at
Wed Jul 8 15:36:41 UTC 2015

On 07/07/2015 at 16:58:09 +0000, Bart Massey wrote:
> +1 for the Farkas-Dyck patch. Someone should check the performance of the
> replacement filterM, though: those loops may have been there for a reason
> that is still valid.

What loops? It was and is a fold.

More information about the Libraries mailing list