Drastic Prelude changes imminent

[Greg Weber]

We already have a process that works pretty well. Create a wiki page that
specifies the implementation. Notifying every Haskell user is pointless if
there is no specification for them to look at. I have no idea why the
specification step was skipped for this change.

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Gabriel Gonzalez <gabriel439 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 1/27/15, 1:59 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
>
>>
>> We could warn about such a discussion in other mailing lists such as
>> haskell, haskell-cafe, haskell-beginner, ghc-dev.
>>
>
> That's a good start, but I'd prefer to also add non-email solutions for
> promoting visibility (i.e. social networks like Twitter, Google+, and
> Reddit).  For example, most of the reason this issue got a lot of
> visibility was the post to /r/haskell earlier today.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20150127/b29c9011/attachment.html>