Proposal: Add (<$>) to Prelude as part of the AMP in GHC 7.10-RC3

[Roman Cheplyaka]

+1 to both. It would be very sad to go through all these hurdles and not
to have a consistent story in the end.

On 24/02/15 17:39, Edward Kmett wrote:
> We have a couple of weeks until the third release candidate for GHC 7.10
> goes out the door.
> 
> Along the way with the last couple of release candidates folks have
> found some problems with the way we implemented the AMP. [1][2]
> 
> Most notably, we failed to include (<$>) in the Prelude, so the standard
> idiom of
> 
> foo <$> bar <*> baz <*> quux
> 
> doesn't work out of the box!
> 
> I'd like to include (<$>) in the Prelude in RC3.
> 
> I'd also like to invite discussion about whether folks believe we should
> include (<$) out of the box. 
> 
> (<$) has been a member of Functor for a long time, which is only visible
> if you import it from Data.Functor or bring in Control.Applicative.
> There is an idiom that you use (<*) and (<$) to point to the parts of
> the structure that you want to keep the answers from when building
> longer such Applicative chains.
> 
> Discussion Period: 2 weeks
> 
> Thank you,
> -Edward Kmett
> 
> [1] http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/2wzixa/shouldnt_be_in_prelude/
> [2] https://plus.google.com/115504368969270249241/posts/URzeDWd7qMp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>