Proposal: change the Bits instance for Bool to align with other basic types and support branchless calculations
Brandon Allbery
allbery.b at gmail.com
Sun Sep 28 19:45:49 UTC 2014
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com>
wrote:
> In particular, I'm not quite seeing where this fits within Data.Bits
It just occurred to me that I may have answered part of this myself on IRC
yesterday, in a different context: the strictness of the other instances
may not indicate a fundamental difference between Bool and the other
instances beyond the fact that the other instances are effectively
spine-strict bit arrays, whereas Bool is free to *express* laziness.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140928/64eb5319/attachment.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list