Pre-Proposal: Add Validation somewhere easily accessible

[Michael Snoyman]

I may have misread, but it seems like Errors is isomorphic to Validation.
Nonetheless, I'd still support having something like Validation in the
either package, as I'm certain the error messages that would result from
using Errors would be atrocious, making it a non-starter for many use cases.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:

> Lift is rather different than Validation.
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:
>
>> On 22/09/14 18:43, Andreas Abel wrote:
>> > UPDATE: I found that "Errors e" on
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/transformers-0.4.1.0/docs/Control-Applicative-Lift.html
>>
>> Brilliant, thanks a lot! For me, having it in transformers outweighs all
>> the benefits that a separate package may provide (especially a package
>> as heavy as 'errors').
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140923/0bc5825b/attachment.html>