Final bikeshedding call: Fixing Control.Exception.bracket
Ganesh Sittampalam
ganesh at earth.li
Wed Nov 19 23:07:04 UTC 2014
On 13/11/2014 10:44, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 13/11/2014 07:47, Merijn Verstraaten wrote:
>> A new version would look like:
>>
>> bracket before after thing =
>> mask $ \restore -> do
>> let atomicAfter = uninterruptibleMask . after
>> a <- before
>> r <- restore (thing a) `onException` atomicAfter a
>> _ <- atomicAfter a
>> return r
>>
>> Slightly different versions are possible and the other relevant
>> bracketing functions mentioned in this thread can be treated similarly.
>
> Since we would need this for catch too, the sensible thing to do (if we
> decide to go ahead with this) would be to change the implementation of
> catch in the RTS from masking the exception handler to
> uninterruptibleMask. That would mean that at least for catch there
> would be no additional overhead, and it would make the modifications to
> the other operations simpler in some cases.
If this isn't done in the RTS, is there a possibility of an async
exception slipping in between the exception handler starting and the
uninterruptibleMask starting?
Cheers,
Ganesh
More information about the Libraries
mailing list