Proposal: Change the signature of mkWeakMVar

[Edward Kmett]

Adding the other variants seems to make sense to me.

TVar has its low-level definition in GHC.Conc, so it is available to base
to define.

-Edward

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:02 PM, John Lato <jwlato at gmail.com> wrote:

> I find it hard to believe that users who understand weak refs would have
> trouble understanding this class, but that's fine. If you think a bunch of
> monomorphic variants are better I don't want to argue the point.
>
> It's a definite need though, since otherwise users have to define these by
> hand, so +1.
>
> Could we also please add versions for the stm types? I've needed at least
> one of them in the past.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20141107/554c3e71/attachment.html>