Proposal: add liftA4 and liftA5 to match liftM4 and liftM5

[John Lato]

Does anyone actually want these?  I would have thought we should go the
other way and deprecate `liftM3+` in favor of using `<*>`.

On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 10:26:36 AM David Feuer <david.feuer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Since Applicative is supposed to be important now, I figure we should get
> these in.
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20141106/b143c450/attachment.html>