add Storable a => Storable (Ratio a) and Storable a => Storable (Complex a) to base
Herbert Valerio Riedel
hvr at gnu.org
Tue Nov 4 07:13:22 UTC 2014
On 2014-11-03 at 17:07:25 +0100, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> Getting those two into base for 7.10 would be quite nice.
>
> I think this will mostly impact folks who maintain numerical computing
> libraries, such as myself, and even then, I think this would be a change
> well worth having!
>
> discussion period 1 week (because I'd like to get it OK'd with plenty of
> time before the merge window for 7.10 finally closes)
I'm +1 for the `Storable (Complex a)` instance;
I am, however, +0.1 for `Storable (Ratio a)`
(I'm not for it as it doesn't seem too useful (and hence used) for
bounded types such as fixed-width integer, otoh I'm not totally against
an instance it as it'd help avoid the temptation of orphan instances as
pointed out in the discussion so far)
More information about the Libraries
mailing list