add Storable a => Storable (Ratio a) and Storable a => Storable (Complex a) to base

[Carter Schonwald]

I dont care about Ratio a personally, but ed mentioned it when I asked for
feedback about complex a

I'm totally ok with narrowing the proposal to just Complex a IF that would
remove any objections

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, John Lato <jwlato at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Rather it makes me question whether `Ratio a` itself makes sense, and
>> perhaps we should monomorphize it to Integers.
>
>
> I've been questioning that for a while, to be honest.
>
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine
> associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com
> ballbery at sinenomine.net
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad
> http://sinenomine.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20141103/0985bfa0/attachment.html>