data-default WAS: [containers] Proposal: Change to the Data.Map Monoid

João Cristóvão jmacristovao at gmail.com
Wed May 21 15:31:56 UTC 2014


I definitely see your point, and have suffered that myself, of course.

I just guess I did not want to get with the trouble of taking ownership of
a package, after trying to contact Lucas Mai on February this year, with no
response.
His github repository shows no activity since October last year.
https://github.com/mauke

But I do guess it is the right thing to do: if anyone knows Lucas and can
contact him, to see if he stills wishes to maintain the package, I would
very much appreciate that (I've also included the .cabal listed email in
this conversation).
If he is not interested or does not respond within a reasonable time frame,
I propose myself as maintainer of the package (and will gladly accept
suggestions).

Cheers
João


2014-05-21 16:18 GMT+01:00 Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>:

> Starting a new thread to continuing discussing this (I should have done so
> in the first place).
>
> Here's the problem: a class like Default is most useful if everyone's
> using the same class. The reason is that multiple libraries are all free to
> reexport the `def` symbol, and they'll all refer to the same identifier. If
> multiple `def`s exist, then this doesn't work, you need to be careful about
> *which* `def` you're using, and you may as well just export a default value
> under its own unique name.
>
> I think data-default-generics is overall an improvement on data-default,
> but the very nature of a fork here makes both packages less useful. I'd
> much rather that data-default simply merged in data-default-generics.
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:12 PM, João Cristóvão <jmacristovao at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sorry for continuing the off-topic, and for promoting a package of mine:
>>
>> If you only need the class definition,
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-default-class is a better
>> choice, with no dependencies.
>>
>> If you prefer a single package with all the dependencies (and with
>> additional generics support), my own fork might be useful:
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-default-generics
>>
>> Although I mirrored the original package dependencies, many of which
>> might actually be unnecessary... (given the generics implementation).
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> 2014-05-21 15:59 GMT+01:00 Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>:
>>
>> At the risk of veering terribly off-topic... the splitting of
>>> data-default into all of those packages caused me a bunch of dependency
>>> headaches, most of which I still don't fully comprehend. I miss the good
>>> ol' days of a single package.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I find myself rather hesitant to recommend that instantiation of the
>>>> idea ever since it exploded into a half-dozen packages full of orphan
>>>> instances, but yes.
>>>>
>>>> -Edward
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr at gnu.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2014-05-21 at 00:23:44 +0200, Andreas Abel wrote:
>>>>> >>> _Lots_ of users initialize empty maps with mempty
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Well, this is another issue, empty should be overloaded via
>>>>> >
>>>>> > class Empty a where
>>>>> >   empty :: a
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, isn't this what
>>>>>
>>>>>   http://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-default
>>>>>
>>>>> provides?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Libraries mailing list
>>>>> Libraries at haskell.org
>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Libraries mailing list
>>>> Libraries at haskell.org
>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Libraries mailing list
>>> Libraries at haskell.org
>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140521/d126d7eb/attachment.html>


More information about the Libraries mailing list