'temporary' package

Carter Schonwald carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Sat May 10 19:35:56 UTC 2014


Let's update that policy with your and Edwards remarks?

On Saturday, May 10, 2014, Erik Hesselink <hesselink at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Gershom Bazerman <gershomb at gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > I understand that Max did a bunch of very important work, then became
> > occupied with other things in the world. And in the long term, that
> needs to
> > be sorted out. But in the short term, a four-day-notice policy is silly.
> And
> > furthermore, even though there's nothing _wrong_ with forking
> promiscuously,
> > it tends to create a mess, to no good end.
>
> Just a small note since this was mentioned a couple of times: as
> hackage admins we don't have a 'four-day-notice policy'. The package
> takeover procedure [0] just says 'a while', and we've taken this to
> mean at least 2-3 weeks to account for vacations, other absences,
> general busyness etc.
>
> Erik
>
> [0] http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Taking_over_a_package
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <javascript:;>
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140510/f4c43b42/attachment.html>


More information about the Libraries mailing list