Gearing up (again) for the next release: 2014.2.0.0

[Mark Lentczner]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:40 AM, harry <voldermort at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Should html be replaced with blaze-html? That's what people actually seem
> to
> be using these days.
>

If we want to switch to blaze-html, we should include it now, but leave
html in for perhaps the next year (two?), marking it deprecated.

Discussion?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140331/4a27d48a/attachment.html>