fsync(2), fdatasync(2), posix_fadvise(2) and posix_fallocate(2)

[davean]

Is this documented somewhere? It seems both I and the original submitter
assumed that tickets would start in the "new" state (and likely be triage
from there).

-davean


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com>
wrote:

> patch = "Please review"
>
> Attachments as in Trac attachments, not links to other websites. This is
> probably not terribly important, but people tend to not tickets with
> attachments more.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:24 PM, davean <davean at xkcd.com> wrote:
>
>> A patch is attached, right there as is a pull location. Not sure what
>> else you could want.
>>
>> Also, the only valid states seem to be (according to trac): closed,
>> infoneeded, merge, new, patch. I see no "Please review" state. Is how to
>> use this documented somewhere?
>>
>> -davean
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It was in the wrong state. Tickets with attached patches that need to be
>>> review should be put in the "Please review" state. It might also help to
>>> actually attach the patch to the ticket.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, davean <davean at xkcd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621
>>>> might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can
>>>> someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it?
>>>>
>>>> This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std
>>>> 1003.1.
>>>>
>>>> -davean
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Libraries mailing list
>>>> Libraries at haskell.org
>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140624/efabaa71/attachment.html>