Issues resulting from inlining build
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Mon Jul 28 11:56:21 UTC 2014
Think of this like worker/wrapper. Given ‘crazy’, with some large body, you want to turn it into
crazy x = build (\cn. craxy’ c n x)
{-# INLINE crazy #-}
Now you can inline crazy everywhere, which will allow a consuming foldr to cancel with the build. And without duplicating all the code.
But if there *is* no foldr, you’ll end up with calls like (crazy’ (:) []) , which will be considerably less efficient than the original function. So you really want *both* crazy’ and crazy’ specialised to (:) and [].
GHC doesn’t do this automatically, because it really works well if the body of crazy is a good producer. But you could imagine automating it.
Simon
From: Libraries [mailto:libraries-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of David Feuer
Sent: 27 July 2014 20:29
To: Haskell Libraries
Subject: Issues resulting from inlining build
I think I finally figured out the deeper problem behind an issue I was having getting some things to fuse fully. I'm hoping someone has a brilliant idea for getting around it. Of course, it may be that someone else has thoroughly studied the matter and determined that there's no good solution. Suppose we write
crazy :: T -> [U]
crazy x = some $ long $ fusion $ pipeline
oops f = map f $ crazy x
uhOh c n = foldr c n $ crazy Pig
ohMy = take bignum $ crazy amigo
When GHC compiles crazy, it rewrites the pieces of the pipeline to build/foldr forms, fuses them, and produces
crazy x = build someBigFunction
In then inlines build, producing
crazy x = anotherBiggy
So far, this looks reasonably sensible, but it's likely bad. The problem is that GHC will (rightly) conclude that `build someBigFunction` is too big to inline, and therefore the fusion will break at that boundary and we'll produce intermediate lists in the functions that use crazy. Now if we were playing the part of the compiler by hand, we would likely factor out someBigFunction and then *refrain from inlining build*. That is, we would get
{-# NOINLINE crazyB #-}
crazyB x = someBigFunction
crazy = nonInliningBuild crazyB
Since we've factored out someBigFunction into crazyB, we can now safely inline crazy itself, allowing the pipeline to continue beyond it. The problem, of course, is that when we *don't* fuse beyond, there is some performance penalty (I have not tried to measure it yet) to passing in (:) and [] at runtime instead of fixing them at compile time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140728/ebb38582/attachment.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list