Looking for help writing some GHC RULES
David Feuer
david.feuer at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 23:34:36 UTC 2014
These rules seem ... weird. Why, for example, do we need a special
mapFB/mapFB rule? Shouldn't map f . map g translate to a
build/foldr/build/foldr, fuse to build/foldr, and then translate back to
map? Is this a case of something that almost works but not quite, and that
needs patching up for a lot of cases?
On Jul 22, 2014 6:53 PM, "wren romano" <winterkoninkje at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:42 PM, David Feuer <david.feuer at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm looking for some help writing some translate/untranslate rules to
> > implement fusion for a couple of basic functions (the ones I'm looking at
> > right now are takeWhile and scanr, but there may be others). I have a
> > translation for takeWhile that seems to be at least decent, and one for
> > scanr that is completely untested. I've never mucked about with GHC
> RULES,
> > however, so I don't even know where to begin.
>
> Probably the best place to start is to take a look at the source for
> GHC.Base and GHC.List, in particular the rules for map and filter
> capture the overarching pattern of how to stage the different rules.
>
> <
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.7.0.1/docs/src/GHC-Base.html#map
> >
> <
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.7.0.1/docs/src/GHC-List.html#filter
> >
>
> --
> Live well,
> ~wren
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140722/edd4703a/attachment.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list